Arlen Specter is No Longer a Republican

Republican Senator, Arlen Specter just announced that he has left the GOP to join the Democrats. Having listened to Specter speak out against the slow moving judiciary nomination system at Capital Hill last summer, I’m surprised by his decision, as are most news writers.

Veteran Republican Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania abruptly switched parties Tuesday, a move intended to boost his re-election chances that also pushed Democrats within one seat of a 60-vote filibuster-resistant majority.

“I now find my political philosophy more in line with Democrats than Republicans,” Specter said in a statement posted on a Web site devoted to Pennsylvania politics and confirmed by his office. Several Senate officials said a formal announcement was expected at mid-afternoon.

But even before the event took place, Specter attended a Senate subcommittee hearing on the swine flu outbreak and took a seat on the Democratic side of the dais.

He made no overt mention of his decision, but said, “Sorry I can’t stay longer, but this is a complicated day for me.”

President Barack Obama called Specter almost immediately after he was informed of the switch to say the Democratic Party was “thrilled to have you,” according to a White House official.

Well, isn’t that cute. Now he’s on Obama’s good side.

Specter, 79, has been a conservative since 1965, so I find it hard to believe that he suddenly changed his political ideologies. Other columnists and writers agree that Specter’s choice was probably motivated by political ambition and not sincerity. He faces a difficult re-election, so he did what he had to in order to keep his senatorial position.

As recently as late winter, he was asked by a reporter why he had not taken Democrats up on past offers to switch parties.

“Because I am a Republican,” he said at the time.

That says it all.


4 thoughts on “Arlen Specter is No Longer a Republican

  1. Specter was a Democrat until 1965, according to the article.

    I don’t know why people think it’s so great to be “loyal” to any party. If that’s true, why is everyone so obsessed with the idea of “bipartisanship”? You can be loyal to a principle, or to your country, or to your friends or family — but a party? What makes a party (as opposed to the ideas it stands for) something good and worthy of loyalty in and of itself?

  2. As a senator, he should be decisive about his beliefs. Sorry about my error. He is elected by conservatives who think he can represent him, and then he changes his ideals. We don’t need a flip-flopper in that position.

  3. This is not a shocker. Specter has been on the fence for decades, and there’s also no arguing that both the Democratic and Republican parties have both gone through immense changes over the decades. Both parties are practically indistinguishable now from how they were when they were founded. Hell, the Republican party isn’t even remotely the same now as it was 20 years ago.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s